Here’s an article explaining why Max Verstappen wasn’t penalized but Lando Norris was at the US Grand Prix:
_Sky Sports Analyst Breaks Down Verstappen-Norris Controversy_
Austin, Texas – The US Grand Prix sparked controversy when Lando Norris received a penalty for his defense against Max Verstappen, while Verstappen’s similar move went unpunished. Sky Sports analyst Anthony Davidson weighed in on the debate.
_Davidson’s Analysis_
“Verstappen’s move on [Charles] Leclerc was deemed a racing incident, whereas Norris’s defense against Verstappen was considered too aggressive,” Davidson explained. “The stewards deemed Norris moved under braking, which is a no-go area.”
_Key Differences_
Davidson highlighted two crucial factors:
1. Braking: Norris braked later than Verstappen, causing the Red Bull driver to take evasive action.
2. Steering: Verstappen’s steering input was smoother, whereas Norris made a more abrupt correction.
_Stewards’ Decision_
“The stewards looked at the data and deemed Norris’s actions excessive,” Davidson said. “Verstappen’s move, while aggressive, didn’t meet the same criteria.”
_Reactions_
– Lando Norris: “I’m disappointed, but I understand the stewards’ decision.”
– Max Verstappen: “I thought it was a fair move, but I’m not the stewards.”
– McLaren Team Principal Zak Brown: “We’ll review the incident and discuss with the FIA.”
_Rules Clarification_
The FIA clarified its stance on defensive driving:
– Drivers can make one move under braking.
– Excessive steering or braking will be penalized.
_Conclusion_
The Verstappen-Norris controversy highlights the nuances of F1’s defensive driving rules. While consistency is key, the stewards’ decisions will always be subject to debate.
Photo Caption: Lando Norris and Max Verstappen in action during the US Grand Prix. (Credit: Getty Images)
Would you like more F1 analysis or another article?
About The Author
